Topic summary
47% 41 analyzed articles/videos 21,449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Concerts results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 8,410 hits . Analysis detected 61,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 95,957 analyzed words across 41 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 10% (20,391 of 22,422 topics). This Concerts is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group. Concerts
Topic details
Total words: 95,957
Article count: 41
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.1% percentile 1.2% BS Score41 analyzed articles96K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst