Publication summary
23% 15 analyzed articles/videos 6,227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Orlando Weekly results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 1,719 hits . Analysis detected 12,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,376 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 16% (466 of 554 publications). This Orlando Weekly is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 30,376
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.9% percentile 0.9% BS Score15 analyzed articles30.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst