Author summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video1,022 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seth Kubersky results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 380 hits. Analysis detected 2,766 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (3,133 of 8,955 authors). This Seth Kubersky is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Seth Kubersky
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠65%Seth Kubersky (selected)3%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,088
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

65% percentile
025507510065.0% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.2%5.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%No True Scotsman: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos