Author summary
20%1 analyzed article/video508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mitch Perry results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 1,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 62% (3,363 of 8,802 authors). This Mitch Perry is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Mitch Perry
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
62%Mitch Perry (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,032
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 5.8%5.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos