Publication summary
53% 24 analyzed articles/videos 18,968 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Delaware Live results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 4,654 hits . Analysis detected 45,514 faulty-reasoning hits from 77,342 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (345 of 577 publications). This Delaware Live is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 77,342
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.3% percentile 1.3% BS Score24 analyzed articles77.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 5.4% 5.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst