Topic summary
37% 14 analyzed articles/videos 7,219 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Safety results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 1,947 hits . Analysis detected 18,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,810 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 6% (21,088 of 22,261 topics). This Community Safety is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group. Community Safety
Topic details
Total words: 36,810
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.3% percentile 1.1% BS Score14 analyzed articles36.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
KTVU 29% 8/2/2026, 4:28:50 PM
KTVU 29% 7/22/2026, 3:37:26 PM