Topic summary
66% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,571 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Safety Online results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 1,928 hits . Analysis detected 14,093 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,877 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 32% (16,723 of 24,545 topics). This Child Safety Online is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group. Child Safety Online
Topic details
Total words: 16,877
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles16.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst