Topic summary
69% 9 analyzed articles/videos 5,915 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Central Banking results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 2,400 hits . Analysis detected 21,810 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,870 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 32% (16,916 of 24,564 topics). This Central Banking is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group. Central Banking
Topic details
Total words: 24,870
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score9 analyzed articles24.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst