Topic summary
96% 26 analyzed articles/videos 20,091 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Censorship results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 12,680 hits . Analysis detected 101,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 93,260 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 38% (14,500 of 23,188 topics). This Censorship is better (less manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group. Censorship
Topic details
Total words: 93,260
Article count: 26
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score26 analyzed articles93.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.6% 13.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst