Topic summary
⁠83%4 analyzed articles/videos565 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biotech results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 392 hits. Analysis detected 2,730 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,640 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,078 of 24,545 topics). This Biotech is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Biotech

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.3% percentile
4.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.8%14.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.9%7.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos