Topic summary
87% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,762 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Big Tech results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 2,601 hits . Analysis detected 24,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,672 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 42% (14,416 of 24,564 topics). This Big Tech is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Big Tech
Topic details
Total words: 23,672
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles23.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst