Topic summary
71% 10 analyzed articles/videos 6,269 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Automotive Technology results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 2,479 hits . Analysis detected 21,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,641 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 35% (16,030 of 24,413 topics). This Automotive Technology is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Automotive Technology
Topic details
Total words: 24,641
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score10 analyzed articles24.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst