Publication summary
53% 83 analyzed articles/videos 58,977 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Drive results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 21,191 hits . Analysis detected 171,524 faulty-reasoning hits from 260,060 analyzed words across 83 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 40% (351 of 584 publications). This The Drive is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 260,060
Article count: 83
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.0% percentile 1.2% BS Score83 analyzed articles260.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst