Author summary
64% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Edelstein results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 1,287 hits . Analysis detected 10,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,650 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 35% (5,914 of 9,074 authors). This Stephen Edelstein is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group. Stephen Edelstein
Author details
Total words: 13,650
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.4% 9.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst