The Drive51%

Someone Turned a BMW M4 Competition xDrive Into a Pickup 28%

By Stephen Edelstein64%

8/1/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 580 faulty-reasoning hits from 487 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (21,467 of 29,795 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the article peer group.

Thanks to Slate and Ford , there’s plenty of talk about compact pickup trucks. 
But if I were put in charge of the auto industry, I’d take things one step further and demand the return of the ute. 
Apparently I’m not alone, because people love to add pickup beds to cars that never originally had them . 
If you’re going to go that route, a 2022 BMW M4 Competition xDrive seems like a good choice of base car. 
After all, it’s got four driven wheels, just like a proper truck. 
Somebody actually went and did this, and now you can benefit from their investment by buying the completed M4 pickup on Bring a Trailer . 
According to the listing, the conversion was done by DinMann in Los Angeles and involved cutting the stock carbon fiber roof in addition to fabricating the bed and a rear bulkhead for the cab. 
Billed as the M4Maloo as a play on the Holden Maloo ute, the pickup was displayed at SEMA wearing a metallic blue wrap, but that’s since been removed to reveal the factory Brooklyn Gray Metallic paint. 
There are plenty of other modifications as well, including a carbon fiber grille, front lip, rear diffuser, side skirts, and fenders with a second pair of vents atop the wheel arches. 
The pickup sits on lowering springs with M Performance forged alloy wheels—19s in front and 20s in back. 
The twin-turbocharged, 3.0-liter inline-six has aftermarket turbos, as well as an aftermarket intake manifold and exhaust. 
The listing doesn’t specify power gains over the stock 503 horsepower and 479 pound-feet of torque, but I imagine they’re pretty healthy. 
An eight-speed automatic transmission was mandatory with the Competition xDrive in this debut model year, along with a limited-slip rear diff. 
The interior is mostly stock aside from a carbon fiber steering wheel, but the car was originally specced with vibrant Fiona Red seats and door-panel trim that go nicely with the Brooklyn Gray exterior. 
Factory features like a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, head-up display, Harman Kardon audio system, and gesture control (not that you’ll want to use it) are retained. 
Remarkably, the listing claims that the pickup conversion also doesn’t interfere with the factory Park Distance Control parking sensors, surround-view camera system, or adaptive cruise control. 
Sure enough, the dots for the rear parking sensors are visible in their usual spots around the rear bumper. 
But it must’ve taken some work to maintain rearview camera functionality on a car that wasn’t designed to have a tailgate. 
It’s also a bit surprising that BMW itself didn’t think of this. 
The automaker has a history of pickup conversions going back to the 1960s , and even made an E92 M3 pickup back when that generation of M3 was new. 
The one-off M3 Touring GT3 race car shows the engineers haven’t lost their sense of humor, though. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.4%Stephen Edelstein: 2.5%The Drive: 2.4%Confirmation Bias8.4%This article: 4.3%Stephen Edelstein: 0.8%The Drive: 0.8%Anchoring Bias4.3%This article: 3.9%Stephen Edelstein: 3.6%The Drive: 3.1%Availability Heuristic3.9%This article: 2.5%Stephen Edelstein: 1.3%The Drive: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic2.5%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.9%The Drive: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Stephen Edelstein: 2.0%The Drive: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias4.5%This article: 2.5%Stephen Edelstein: 5.7%The Drive: 3.4%Framing Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.5%The Drive: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.9%Stephen Edelstein: 1.5%The Drive: 0.6%Status Quo Bias4.9%This article: 5.1%Stephen Edelstein: 0.5%The Drive: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect5.1%This article: 10.1%Stephen Edelstein: 5.7%The Drive: 2.7%Optimism Bias10.1%This article: 4.3%Stephen Edelstein: 1.2%The Drive: 1.5%Pessimism Bias4.3%This article: 7.8%Stephen Edelstein: 2.4%The Drive: 5.0%Negativity Bias7.8%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.4%The Drive: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 1.1%The Drive: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.2%The Drive: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.2%The Drive: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.2%The Drive: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Stephen Edelstein: 4.4%The Drive: 2.4%Halo Effect10.5%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.4%The Drive: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.2%The Drive: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 3.9%The Drive: 2.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 4.9%Stephen Edelstein: 1.6%The Drive: 1.5%False Dilemma4.9%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.1%The Drive: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.1%The Drive: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.9%Stephen Edelstein: 5.7%The Drive: 5.1%Hasty Generalization3.9%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.5%The Drive: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.9%Stephen Edelstein: 0.1%The Drive: 0.6%Bandwagon3.9%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 1.0%The Drive: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.2%The Drive: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 1.8%The Drive: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.5%The Drive: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.0%Stephen Edelstein: 5.2%The Drive: 2.9%Anecdotal8.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.1%The Drive: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.5%Stephen Edelstein: 1.7%The Drive: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.5%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 6.8%Stephen Edelstein: 0.5%The Drive: 0.3%Personal Incredulity6.8%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.2%The Drive: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.3%Stephen Edelstein: 1.9%The Drive: 1.4%Unattributed Quote5.3%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.8%The Drive: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.9%Stephen Edelstein: 9.4%The Drive: 8.3%Biased Writer Voice4.9%This article: 4.9%Stephen Edelstein: 1.9%The Drive: 1.0%Indoctrination4.9%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephen Edelstein: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Stephen Edelstein: 2.1%The Drive: 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.1%

487 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.