Speaker summary
81%3 analyzed articles/videos196.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vickie Paladino results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 683.077 faulty-reasoning hits from 196.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 16% and a BS Rank of 27% (32,283 of 43,769 speakers). This Vickie Paladino is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Vickie Paladino
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
27%Vickie Paladino (selected)17%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 196.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510026.2% percentile
16.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos196.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.1%19.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.1%28.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 3.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%No True Scotsman: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos