Author summary
76%12 analyzed articles/videos14,260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russell Payne results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 5,840 hits. Analysis detected 53,127 faulty-reasoning hits from 60,340 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (6,000 of 8,706 authors). This Russell Payne is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Russell Payne
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
32%Russell Payne (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 60,340
Article count: 12
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

31% percentile
025507510031.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score12 analyzed articles60.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.7%9.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.9%5.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate