Speaker summary
77% 17 analyzed articles/videos 985.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Cheung results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Appeal to Authority , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 219.978 hits . Analysis detected 2,368.734 faulty-reasoning hits from 985.667 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (41,943 of 44,965 speakers). This Steven Cheung is better (less manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group. Steven Cheung
Speaker details
Total words: 985.667
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.7% percentile 7.1% BS Score17 analyzed videos985.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 21.9% 21.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 13.2% 13.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 11.5% 11.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 10.6% 10.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Tu Quoque: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst