Author summary
80% 10 analyzed articles/videos 4,011 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Graig Graziosi results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 2,602 hits . Analysis detected 17,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,540 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 38% (5,665 of 9,127 authors). This Graig Graziosi is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group. Graig Graziosi
Author details
Total words: 19,540
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score9 analyzed articles19.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst