Speaker summary
47%8 analyzed articles/videos562.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie White results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 153 hits. Analysis detected 914.808 faulty-reasoning hits from 562.667 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 3% (43,784 of 45,061 speakers). This Stephanie White is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group.
Stephanie White
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
3%Stephanie White (selected)5%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751002.8% percentile
4.8% BS Score8 analyzed videos562.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.9%2.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate