Author summary
92% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jo Bartosch results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 1,718 hits . Analysis detected 11,766 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,260 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 68% (3,065 of 9,538 authors). This Jo Bartosch is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group. Jo Bartosch
Author details
Total words: 9,260
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.9% percentile 2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.6% 18.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Nature: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst