Speaker summary
29%7 analyzed articles/videos131 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie Grisham results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 119 faulty-reasoning hits from 131 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of 15% (34,961 of 40,821 speakers). This Stephanie Grisham is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
Stephanie Grisham
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
15%Stephanie Grisham (selected)11%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510014.4% percentile
10.8% BS Score7 analyzed videos131 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 12.7%12.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.2%15.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate