Speaker summary
41% 11 analyzed articles/videos 296 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spanish government results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Straw Man , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 141 hits . Analysis detected 685 faulty-reasoning hits from 296 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 9% (40,552 of 44,212 speakers). This Spanish government is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group. Spanish government
Speaker details
Total words: 296
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.3% percentile 7.9% BS Score11 analyzed videos296 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 14.1% 14.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 11.4% 11.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 14.9% 14.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 21.2% 21.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst