Speaker summary
60% 16 analyzed articles/videos 1,238.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Jennings results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 291.731 hits . Analysis detected 2,485.499 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,238.667 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (42,969 of 44,429 speakers). This Scott Jennings is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group. Scott Jennings
Speaker details
Total words: 1,238.667
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.3% percentile 5.2% BS Score16 analyzed videos1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 23.0% 23.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 15.7% 15.7% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Horn Effect: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 1.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Composition/Division: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst