Speaker summary
59% 11 analyzed articles/videos 832.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan Hochman results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Confirmation Bias , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 183 hits . Analysis detected 1,952.691 faulty-reasoning hits from 832.333 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 6% (38,753 of 41,065 speakers). This Nathan Hochman is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group. Nathan Hochman
Speaker details
Total words: 832.333
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.6% percentile 6.6% BS Score11 analyzed videos832.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst