Author summary
72% 5 analyzed articles/videos 6,378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Libor Jany results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 3,411 hits . Analysis detected 22,296 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,522 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 47% (4,872 of 9,092 authors). This Libor Jany is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group. Libor Jany
Author details
Total words: 23,522
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles23.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.5% 14.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst