Speaker summary
78% 35 analyzed articles/videos 1,745.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Letitia James results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Begging the Question , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 434.812 hits . Analysis detected 3,639.695 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,745.667 analyzed words across 35 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 4% (43,704 of 45,134 speakers). This Letitia James is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Letitia James
Speaker details
Total words: 1,745.667
Article count: 35
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.2% percentile 5.1% BS Score35 analyzed videos1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 17.5% 17.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 24.9% 24.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.3% 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.9%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.0% Straw Man: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst