Author summary
56% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,735 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sophia Lebowitz results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 1,200 hits . Analysis detected 8,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,234 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 22% (7,412 of 9,471 authors). This Sophia Lebowitz is better (less manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group. Sophia Lebowitz
Author details
Total words: 13,234
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst