Author summary
56%4 analyzed articles/videos2,735 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sophia Lebowitz results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 1,200 hits. Analysis detected 8,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,234 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 22% (7,412 of 9,471 authors). This Sophia Lebowitz is better (less manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Sophia Lebowitz
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
22%Sophia Lebowitz (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,234
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

22% percentile
025507510021.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate