Speaker summary
⁠56%5 analyzed articles/videos596 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lara Trump results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Optimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 92.937 hits. Analysis detected 1,045.569 faulty-reasoning hits from 596 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (38,051 of 39,273 speakers). This Lara Trump is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group.
Lara Trump
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠4%Lara Trump (selected)6%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 596
Content count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751003.1% percentile
5.1% BS Score5 analyzed videos596 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.4%13.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos