Speaker summary
77%4 analyzed articles/videos285.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Hassett results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Optimism Bias, and Red Herring, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 698.459 faulty-reasoning hits from 285.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of 13% (39,542 of 45,122 speakers). This Kevin Hassett is better (less manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group.
Kevin Hassett
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
13%Kevin Hassett (selected)10%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510012.4% percentile
9.8% BS Score4 analyzed videos285.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 11.7%11.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 6.0%Red Herring: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate