Author summary
98% 3 analyzed articles/videos 220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Walter Einenkel results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.2% saturation with 478 hits . Analysis detected 2,584 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,218 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 93% (698 of 9,482 authors). This Walter Einenkel is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group. Walter Einenkel
Author details
Total words: 1,218
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.6% percentile 6.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 39.2% 39.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 23.5% 23.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 29.9% 29.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Author 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 39.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 29.9%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 23.0%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 23.5%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.9%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.4%, sitewide 3.3% Red Herring: Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.7% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.0% Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst