Author summary
98%3 analyzed articles/videos220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Walter Einenkel results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.2% saturation with 478 hits. Analysis detected 2,584 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,218 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 93% (698 of 9,482 authors). This Walter Einenkel is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.
Walter Einenkel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
93%Walter Einenkel (selected)7%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,218
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

93% percentile
025507510092.6% percentile
6.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 39.2%39.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 23.5%23.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 29.9%29.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Author 6.9%6.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 39.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 29.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 23.0%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 23.5%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Author 8.9%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.4%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.7%In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.0%Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos