97%3 analyzed articles/videos121.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Douglas Herman results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 64.9% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 579.459 faulty-reasoning hits from 121.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 37.5% and a BS Rank of 59% (18,811 of 45,123 speakers).This Douglas Herman is worse (more manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.