Author summary
80% 2 analyzed articles/videos 961 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dani Anguiano results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 720 hits . Analysis detected 5,069 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,804 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,161 of 8,907 authors). This Dani Anguiano is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. Dani Anguiano
Author details
Total words: 5,804
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst