Speaker summary
53% 148 analyzed articles/videos 2,705 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Central Command results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Unattributed Quote , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 890.373 hits . Analysis detected 5,175.279 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,705 analyzed words across 148 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (43,351 of 44,027 speakers). This Central Command is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group. Central Command
Speaker details
Total words: 2,705
Article count: 148
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.5% percentile 3.8% BS Score148 analyzed videos2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 25.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst