Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Erik Lin-Greenberg results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Indoctrination , and Hindsight Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 125 hits . Analysis detected 447 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,788 authors). This Erik Lin-Greenberg is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Erik Lin-Greenberg
Author details
Total words: 3,420
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst