Speaker summary
56% 9 analyzed articles/videos 417 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brendan Carr results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Negativity Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 90.833 hits . Analysis detected 736.509 faulty-reasoning hits from 417 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 9% (36,690 of 40,167 speakers). This Brendan Carr is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group. Brendan Carr
Speaker details
Total words: 417
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.7% percentile 8.2% BS Score9 analyzed videos417 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 12.0% 12.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 19.5% 19.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 2.2% Tu Quoque: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst