Publication summary
9% 10 analyzed articles/videos 15,727 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston Landing results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 2,644 hits . Analysis detected 24,217 faulty-reasoning hits from 62,908 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 6% (517 of 548 publications). This Houston Landing is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 62,908
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.7% percentile 0.8% BS Score10 analyzed articles62.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst