Author summary
⁠18%1 analyzed article/video1,818 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eileen Grench results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 361 hits. Analysis detected 3,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (7,264 of 8,568 authors). This Eileen Grench is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.
Eileen Grench
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠16%Eileen Grench (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,272
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

15% percentile
025507510015.2% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos