Author summary
11% 3 analyzed articles/videos 7,639 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna-Catherine Brigida results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 1,111 hits . Analysis detected 8,925 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,556 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (9,340 of 9,471 authors). This Anna-Catherine Brigida is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. Anna-Catherine Brigida
Author details
Total words: 30,556
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.4% percentile 0.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles30.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst