Author summary
20% 1 analyzed article/video 1,372 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fiza Kuzhiyil results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Biased Writer Voice , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 289 hits . Analysis detected 2,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 26% (6,440 of 8,706 authors). This Fiza Kuzhiyil is better (less manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group. Fiza Kuzhiyil
Author details
Total words: 5,488
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst