Keyword summary
63% 138 analyzed articles/videos 90,534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildfires results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 31,243 hits . Analysis detected 226,288 faulty-reasoning hits from 403,610 analyzed words across 138 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 5% (49,221 of 51,590 keywords). This Wildfires is better (less manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group. Wildfires
Keyword details
Total words: 403,610
Article count: 138
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.6% percentile 1.1% BS Score138 analyzed articles403.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst