Keyword summary
⁠54%5 analyzed articles/videos3,222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ransom Notes results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 915 hits. Analysis detected 7,804 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,668 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (44,153 of 57,505 keywords). This Ransom Notes is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Ransom Notes
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠24%Ransom Notes (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510023.2% percentile
1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos