Keyword summary
71% 10 analyzed articles/videos 7,900 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pfas results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 2,532 hits . Analysis detected 24,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,793 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 31% (36,070 of 51,744 keywords). This Pfas is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group. Pfas
Keyword details
Total words: 27,793
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score10 analyzed articles27.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 0.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst