Keyword summary
86% 16 analyzed articles/videos 3,782 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peace Deal results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 3,206 hits . Analysis detected 32,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,200 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 48% (29,934 of 57,388 keywords). This Peace Deal is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group. Peace Deal
Keyword details
Total words: 26,200
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.8% percentile 2.3% BS Score16 analyzed articles26.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst