Keyword summary
92% 11 analyzed articles/videos 11,075 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Met Gala results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 8,468 hits . Analysis detected 49,735 faulty-reasoning hits from 42,157 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 49% (28,786 of 56,203 keywords). This Met Gala is better (less manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group. Met Gala
Keyword details
Total words: 42,157
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score11 analyzed articles42.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 20.1% 20.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst