Author summary
⁠86%4 analyzed articles/videos2,654 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lillian Gissen results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 2,440 hits. Analysis detected 14,798 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,349 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (1,996 of 8,524 authors). This Lillian Gissen is worse (more manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group.
Lillian Gissen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠77%Lillian Gissen (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,349
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

77% percentile
025507510076.6% percentile
3.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.0%10.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.7%16.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 11.5%11.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 26.1%26.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.5%13.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 26.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.5%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 11.5%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos