Author summary
68% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ellie Muir results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 1,344 hits . Analysis detected 6,146 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,080 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,069 of 8,706 authors). This Ellie Muir is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. Ellie Muir
Author details
Total words: 8,080
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 13.4% 13.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 13.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst