Keyword summary
63% 24 analyzed articles/videos 12,532 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Carney results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 5,014 hits . Analysis detected 47,054 faulty-reasoning hits from 56,750 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 23% (41,334 of 53,106 keywords). This Mark Carney is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Mark Carney
Keyword details
Total words: 56,750
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score24 analyzed articles56.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst