Author summary
70% 1 analyzed article/video 1,022 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kelly Geraldine Malone The Canadian Press results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Unattributed Quote , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 421 hits . Analysis detected 3,959 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (3,233 of 9,053 authors). This Kelly Geraldine Malone The Canadian Press is worse (more manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group. Kelly Geraldine Malone The Canadian Press
Author details
Total words: 4,088
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst