Keyword summary
71% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,992 analyzed words
BS Summary: These I Want Your Sex results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,587 hits . Analysis detected 10,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,968 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 39% (34,601 of 56,649 keywords). This I Want Your Sex is better (less manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group. I Want Your Sex
Keyword details
Total words: 11,968
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst